I understand the getModelObject() thing, but I not about the getDefaultModel(). Why is that?
I've found an e-mail ( http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/wicket-dev/200806.mbox/%[email protected]%3e) that states that it may be removed in 1.5. Why rename getModel to getDefaultModel just to take it out later? Not a critic, just trying to understand. Tetsuo On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 11:18 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected] > wrote: > A good overall read, but he also seemed to miss the reason we have > getModel**Object**. He doesn't think that's necessary, but misses > that there is also getModel (without object) and the word does clarify > the difference. > > Anyway, a good read on overall API design, though. I'd recommend it > to others with the caveat that I also disagree with his last part > about the rename. > > -- > Jeremy Thomerson > http://www.wickettraining.com > > > > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2009 at 8:22 AM, Martijn > Dashorst<[email protected]> wrote: > > > http://weblogs.java.net/blog/timboudreau/archive/2009/07/api_design_vs_a_1.html > > > > I guess he doesn't get why we did the rename. This reminds me that we > > *really* should improve our release docs before we finalize 1.4!!! > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > > Apache Wicket 1.3.5 is released > > Get it now: http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.3. > > >
