On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Robin Sander <robin.san...@gmx.net> wrote:
> Another question because someone mentioned it in this thread and I asked > this question myself: > why do we need an empty interface for Model? Why can't a mere String or any > serializable POJO be > used as a model? (than this discussion about the name would end also...) > I'm not sure I understand what you're saying. IModel is currently the interface and is not an empty interface. And an instance of IModel is a data proxy / location service - not the actual data itself - which is whay any POJO can not be a model. The POJO is the model object. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com