On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 7:44 AM, Robin Sander <robin.san...@gmx.net> wrote:

> Another question because someone mentioned it in this thread and I asked
> this question myself:
> why do we need an empty interface for Model? Why can't a mere String or any
> serializable POJO be
> used as a model? (than this discussion about the name would end also...)
>

I'm not sure I understand what you're saying.  IModel is currently the
interface and is not an empty interface.  And an instance of IModel is a
data proxy / location service - not the actual data itself - which is whay
any POJO can not be a model.  The POJO is the model object.

--
Jeremy Thomerson
http://www.wickettraining.com

Reply via email to