Since you were referring to me Martijn, since my vote was the only one that came within 2 hours, I did test it and have been running the version that will be 1.4.7 for some time.
thanks, Steve On 03/03/2010, at 1:11 AM, Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On Tue, Mar 2, 2010 at 2:51 PM, James Carman > <[email protected]> wrote: >> While only committers have binding votes, all votes from the community >> should be (and certainly are) considered. > > True. Though I value folks that actually test the release higher than > a +1 that arrives within 2 hours of the start of a vote. > > I encourage anyone to vote when they have actually tested the release > (download/checkout the sources, run a maven build, click through the > examples or test it with your own application). A +1 just because you > want a new version only muddies the result and is not as helpful. > >> That isn't to say that >> these VOTE threads should be on the users@ list. If a user is >> interested enough in the development of the Wicket project, they >> should subscribe to the dev@ list also. We don't want to spam the >> users@ list with stuff most users don't care about. > > True. For important issues, such as major API breaks (like generics, > or constructor change) we always consult the community at large > instead of just d...@. > > Martijn
