Well, I think we've come to agreement that the enhancement won't really do what it was meant to do. So, why keep it?
On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:57 PM, Alex Objelean <alex.objel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Reading the entire thread regarding WICKET-2846, shows that only one person > is against this feature without even having a good reasoning. I don't think > that this is enough to remove the feature from 1.4.9 release. I was the > person who requested it and have a good use-case for it. Anyway, as many > other people said before, there is absolutely no reason for worry. > > Alex > -- > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/vote-Release-Wicket-1-4-9-tp2222388p2225203.html > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >
