I'd rather not go beyond 100, or if forced 120. Trying to stuff too much into one line especially with nested ifs/fors/whiles is a really big code smell. If you need 160 characters to read the whole code, then refactor the code.
Martijn On Fri, Nov 5, 2010 at 9:30 AM, Erik van Oosten <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Jeremy, > > Code is not only for the developers, as this is an open source project it is > also read by many many other people that use Wicket. Not all of those > developers have access to 23" screens. I am often stuck on a 17" screen, > many colleagues use 2 17" screens. On such screens up to 120 characters is > acceptable, 160 not. > > Regards, > Erik. > > > Op 05-11-10 06:13, Jeremy Thomerson wrote: >> >> While we're sort of discussing this, how would everyone feel about >> increasing our line wrap length? It's currently 100. I always work on >> widescreens (which even most laptops are now), and love having it closer >> to >> 160 (or 180, but that's a little much for many folks). >> >> How would everyone feel about 160? >> >> > > -- > Sent from my SMTP compliant software > Erik van Oosten > http://day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/ > > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
