> Don't hesitate to attach quickstart app or tests to any of the tickets. > This is one of the reasons the Wicket team invited me to join them :-)
The problem is that this is a drop-in replacement/fix for modal window, it should pass all existing modal window tests. So there isn't really any new wicket-level functionality to test. All changes are in javascript. Is it possible to drop in selenium tests? ** Martin > > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 10:44 AM, Martin Makundi < > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > >> Ok. We are currently testing it and if you have any test code snipplet >> requests, please just comment on the ticket and we will provide what >> you need whereas wickettester/junit are concerned. >> >> ** >> Martin >> >> 2010/11/9 Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>: >> > Hi Martin, >> > >> > I am aware of the ticket. >> > Last two weeks there are several tickets/discussions about ModalWindow. >> The >> > problem is that it is used by many people and we have to be careful with >> the >> > fixes there. >> > I also saw your comment on WICKET-2053, so we will take a look at it as >> well >> > when we star looking at it. >> > >> > On Tue, Nov 9, 2010 at 8:07 AM, Martin Makundi < >> > martin.maku...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi Martin! >> >> >> >> Pls take a look at a fix for ModalWindows that are nested inside IFrame: >> >> >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3151 >> >> >> >> This wasn't supported before but Rodolfo kindly added support for it >> >> and fixed some bugs in it. >> >> >> >> ** >> >> Martin >> >> >> >> >> >> > Tue, 20 Jul 2010 08:54:07 -0700 Martin Grigorov >> >> > >> >> > Just feed me with patches for 1.4 ;-) >> >> > >> >> > 2010/7/20 Johan Compagner <jcompag...@gmail.com> >> >> > >> >> > > welcome! >> >> > > >> >> > > hope you happily merge even more stuff ;) >> >> > > >> >> > > johan >> >> >> > >> >
