On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 3:10 AM, Jeremy Thomerson <[email protected]>wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 7:18 AM, Peter Ertl (JIRA) <[email protected]>wrote: > >> >> [ >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3161?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel] >> >> Peter Ertl resolved WICKET-3161. >> -------------------------------- >> >> Resolution: Fixed >> Fix Version/s: 1.5-M4 >> >> I am confident that this issue is fixed but I am not very happy about the >> solution. Please feel free to improve it or send me feedback. >> >> I also added a test case in wicket source to test for existance of cookies >> that were set during a link listener event. >> >> General question to wicket devs: Is it ok to "resolve issue" if I am not >> happy with a solution but the issue is fixed? > > > I don't see why not, although if you're really dissatisfied with the > solution, you may want to open a follow-up ticket to clean up the solution. > > > Jeremy > >> > > My approach in such cases is to attach a patch and ask for review. martin-g
