If it's not that hard to implement a few HTML5 types, it might pick up far more press coverage than if it does not.
On Dec 6, 2010, at 2:14 AM, Igor Vaynberg wrote: > you can always tweak it later, i dont think it will require api > breaks. even if it is in 1.5.1. i dont think a lot of people are using > html5 specific types yet, so while it is "cool" im not sure about the > utility just yet. > > -igor > > On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 11:06 PM, Martijn Dashorst > <[email protected]> wrote: >> I'd like to at least provide html5 components out-of-the-box before we >> ship 1.5. Would be a drag explaining that we don't support >> type="email" or type="url" in our new version. >> >> Martijn >> >> On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 3:52 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> >> wrote: >>> i think 1.5.x branch is stable enough to release RCs. this vote is to >>> make the next release RC1. >>> >>> vote ends Wednesday 5pm GMT+2 >>> >>> -igor >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> >
