I'm just saying that Google Code's interface is much cleaner and friendlier, which helps a lot with projects' adoption (you don't get a .
And it supports Mercurial, which is pretty much the same as git in terms of cloning and merging changes back. On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 7:37 PM, tetsuo <ronald.tet...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> GitHub may be a little better for developers, but I think it's quite >> intimidating to users (people who just want to easily download the >> binaries and read the documentation). >> >> Google Code (thus, Apache extras) is much more friendly to >> non-committer-users. >> >> But well, if one is fine with that randomly structured wicketstuff >> wiki site, github shouldn't be a problem... (sigh) >> > It will not be randomly structured. > There will be a main page with links to the documentation for each project. > Just like it was/is in Confluence. > >> >> >> >> On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 4:25 PM, Carl-Eric Menzel <cmen...@wicketbuch.de> >> wrote: >> >> Moving to Github >> > >> > +1 for github. It makes distributed development so much easier. As for >> > staying close to Apache... apache.org is only a link away. >> > >> > Carl-Eric >> > www.wicketbuch.de >> > >> >
