See dev@: Jetty 7 iff servlet-api 2.5

Servlet API 2.5 has been around for ages. Containers are moving
forward, as should we.

Martijn

On Sun, Jan 23, 2011 at 2:52 AM, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote:
> No, no... such core dependency wouldn't be changed just because an
> example need it. There must be another reason.
>
>
> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 10:06 PM, Clint Checketts <[email protected]> wrote:
>> I believe the wicket-examples attached jetty jar was upgraded which
>> required the servlet update.
>>
>> On Saturday, January 22, 2011, tetsuo <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> Er... why was servlet API dependency version upgraded to 2.5? I can't
>>> remember the discussion. Searched for it, but only found a pre-1.4
>>> discussion, which was settled on 2.4.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 7:02 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> The Wicket Team is proud to introduce the first Release Candidate in
>>>> Wicket 1.5 series. The 1.5 series provides the following major
>>>> improvements:
>>>> * A more powerful and flexible request processing pipeline
>>>> * Intercomponent event mechanism
>>>> * Improved configuration
>>>> * More flexible markup loading
>>>> * Better proxy support (x-forwarded-for header)
>>>>
>>>> More detailed migration notes are available on our [Migrate to 1.5
>>>> Wiki Page](https://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/migration-to-wicket-15.html)
>>>>
>>>> Release Artifacts:
>>>> * Subversion tag: 
>>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/releases/wicket-1.5-RC1
>>>> * Changelog: 
>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310561&fixfor=12315483&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC
>>>> * To use in Maven:
>>>> <dependency>
>>>>    <groupId>org.apache.wicket</groupId>
>>>>    <artifactId>wicket</artifactId>
>>>>    <version>1.5-RC1</version>
>>>> </dependency>
>>>> * Download the full distribution:
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/closer.cgi/wicket/1.5-RC1 (including source)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers!
>>>>
>>>
>>
>



-- 
Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com

Reply via email to