On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Jeremy Thomerson < jer...@wickettraining.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 12:36 PM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org>wrote: > >> Let's think now what problems would cause making -extentions (and all >> other >> except -util and -request) depending on wicket.jar >> > > IMHO, we do *not* want wicket.jar to even be available in Maven. The > aggregate jar should be only for those who do not use Maven. Those who use > it should just change from "wicket" to "wicket-core" when they upgrade > versions and everything will continue to work. > Should have mentioned the reason again for this: to avoid the possibility of Maven users having duplicate classes in the classpath. -- Jeremy Thomerson http://wickettraining.com *Need a CMS for Wicket? Use Brix! http://brixcms.org*
