I don't know. May be too long ago. -Juergen
On Fri, Mar 4, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > In the context of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3497 I want > to ask other Wicket devs whether WicketFilter parses only one > <filter-mapping> and ignores others by intention ? > Debugging https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-3497 I think Wicket > 1.4 handles the case with two or more <filter-mappings> on the same <filter> > by accident. > > So my question is: were there any discussions (around Wicket 1.1/1.2) that > WicketFilter/WicketServlet should work only with the first <**-mapping> ? > > > Example from the ticket quickstart: > > <servlet> > <servlet-name>wicket.getUrlTest</servlet-name> > <servlet-class>org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.WicketServlet</servlet-class> > <init-param> > <param-name>applicationClassName</param-name> > <param-value>fs.quick.wicket.WicketApplication</param-value> > </init-param> > </servlet> > > <servlet-mapping> > <servlet-name>wicket.getUrlTest</servlet-name> > <url-pattern>/app/*</url-pattern> > </servlet-mapping> > > <servlet-mapping> > <servlet-name>wicket.getUrlTest</servlet-name> > <url-pattern>/longapp/*</url-pattern> > </servlet-mapping> > > martin-g >
