Are you sure ? I have never used something like this but it sounds bad. I commit something and then when I open the logs I see something different (my change + some formatting). This way the history is totally messed up.
On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Peter Ertl <pe...@gmx.org> wrote: > +1 on commit-hook-based code formatting > > Am 07.04.2011 um 18:06 schrieb Hans Lesmeister 2: > > > > > Martin Grigorov-4 wrote: > >> > >> On Thu, Apr 7, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Hans Lesmeister 2 < > >> hans.lesmeis...@lessy-software.de> wrote: > >> > >>> IMHO Formatting should be done on commit. > >>> > >> > >> I guess you don't follow your colleagues work using email notifications. > >> > >> > > > > I am not sure if I know what you mean by that. With "on commit" I meant > on > > the server, in this case the Git-Server. That way everybody can format > the > > way he or she likes. > > > > ----- > > -- > > Regards, > > Hans > > > > http://cantaa.de > > > > -- > > View this message in context: > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicketstuff-1-5-Code-formatting-tp3432552p3433858.html > > Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at > Nabble.com. > > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
