No. We tell them to use wicket:pom as we agreed few months ago (after the OSGi discussions) https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Migration+to+Wicket+1.5#MigrationtoWicket1.5-Mavenusersarerecommendedtodependonorg.apache.wicket%3Awicket%3Apomfromnowon
It seems Maven 2 has problems... With Maven 3 I didn't have any problems so far. On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 6:15 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 14, 2011 at 4:47 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: >> Either use org.apache.wicket:wicket:pom or org.apache.wicket:wicket-core:jar >> >> I think we agreed to use :pom few months ago. > > That is broken... we tell folks to use wicket-core as their > dependency, we should do the same. Depending on wicket.pom is really > bad conceptually. > > Martijn > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
