True but I have not seen any reasonable usable examples. Especially towards rest usage would ne nice.
Ron On Jul 20, 2011 2:37 PM, "Steve Mactaggart" <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm the same, I have only every used just @MountPath on its own, but if > those other strategies existed I assumed that someone must have used them. > > I like the 1.5 port as it is, and now that its done hopefully others using > it will try and upgrade to 1.5 and if they can somehow put forward use cases > for the strategies then I guess it can be put back in. > > But from what I've read on the new mapper in 1.5 it seems to obsolete the > need for all the other strategies. > > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 11:34 PM, Ron Smits <[email protected]> wrote: > >> If all the different strategies stay in, would it not be good to have some >> more real world like examples. In the different applications we have done >> until now we have only used the normal @mountpath. >> >> Ron >> On Jul 20, 2011 3:17 PM, "Steve Mactaggart" <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Looks pretty much like the changes I made, I just wasn't confident enough >> > that my mount code was going to work well enough in the cases related to >> > removal of the different coding strategies. >> > >> > I'll have to grab the latest source and see how it compares. >> > >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected] >> >wrote: >> > >> >> The source is at >> >> >> https://github.com/wicketstuff/core/tree/master/jdk-1.5-parent/annotation >> . >> >> It is already migrated to 1.5 and it will be available at Maven repos >> >> with the next release. >> >> >> >> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 7:03 AM, Steve Mactaggart >> >> <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Excellent. >> >> > >> >> > From the work I did at the time I was investigating the move to 1.5 it >> >> seems >> >> > that most of the different Strategies have been removed in 1.5 and can >> be >> >> > nearly completely controlled using only the @MountPath annotation. >> >> > >> >> > We never needed to use things like the HybridMountStrategy, so It was >> >> hard >> >> > for me to know what they were supposed to do and so I have a local >> copy >> >> of >> >> > the annotations updated enough for us to test that they can be used to >> >> mount >> >> > our pages in 1.5. >> >> > >> >> > Just FYI we decided to NOT upgrade to 1.5 until its final, (business >> >> > reasons) but apart from some corner cases that I think we would be >> able >> >> to >> >> > get around, with some effort, the move to 1.5 is a doable process. The >> >> > biggest changes we had was getting the annotations sub-project updated >> to >> >> > work with 1.5 and getting a wiquery build for the right 1.5-RC.. >> >> > >> >> > If you want to see the hack's I've done, or even want to discuss my >> >> research >> >> > please let me know and I'll pass on what I can. >> >> > >> >> > Steve >> >> > >> >> > On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 1:41 PM, Donohoe Digital <[email protected]> >> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> Hi Steve, >> >> >> >> >> >> I'm the original developer of wicketstuff-annotation and am getting >> back >> >> >> into Wicket development after a long hiatus. I'll probably be looking >> >> into >> >> >> this over the next month or so. >> >> >> >> >> >> I tried to bring up the old wiki page for this and it doesn't seem to >> be >> >> >> working. It looks like wicketstuff is now using git, so I'll have to >> >> >> figure >> >> >> out where the source lives. >> >> >> >> >> >> -Doug Donohoe >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/State-of-wicketstuff-Annotations-tp3587286p3679935.html >> >> >> Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive >> at >> >> >> Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Martin Grigorov >> >> jWeekend >> >> Training, Consulting, Development >> >> http://jWeekend.com >> >> >>
