The problem with com.mycila.maven-license-plugin:maven-license-plugin
as far as i remember is that is not yet published in central maven
repository, so it cannot be used without adding their repo. in the pom.xml
which is a problem if you are trying to get your project deployed in OSS
Sonatype.

On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Martin Grigorov-4 [via Apache Wicket] <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Brian,
>
> The main user of JUnit in production is WicketTester.
>
> About ApacheLicenceTest - Jeremy tried to replace it with
> com.mycila.maven-license-plugin:maven-license-plugin in 1.4.x but
> didn't finish it.
>
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 6:04 AM, Brian Topping <[hidden 
> email]<http://user/SendEmail.jtp?type=node&node=3742539&i=0>>
> wrote:
>
> > oic, there's a ApacheLicenseHeaderTest in every project.
> >
> > I'm in the process of isolating the junit.framework package to a test
> dependency so JUnit is not a dependency in production code.  If it were made
> into a plugin, the instances of per-project ApacheLicenseHeader
> configuration would need to come from the POM.  That's kind of where it
> belongs (it's part of the build, after all), but it could easily be made
> into a configuration file that resides in each project to keep the POMs
> clean.
> >
> > Failing that, creating a separate module to contain o.a.w.util.license
> that is a test scope dependency would be a last resort.
> >
> > I'm going to go ahead and create a plugin that reads a configuration file
> in each project.  Some of the configurations are lengthy
> (org.apache.wicket.util.license.ApacheLicenceHeaderTest).  That would be a
> mess in the pom.
> >
> >
> > On Aug 13, 2011, at 10:09 PM, Brian Topping wrote:
> >
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> Does anyone know why org.apache.wicket.util.license is in wicket-util's
> production source directory?  I'm guessing it has something to do with the
> desire to get the license plugin to fire every time a build is made, but if
> that's the case, it would be better handled as a Maven plugin.  It's not a
> test and it's not a part of any public API.
> >>
> >> I'm happy to create a plugin if that's the case, please let me know.
> >>
> >> Cheers, Brian
> >
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Martin Grigorov
> jWeekend
> Training, Consulting, Development
> http://jWeekend.com
>
>
> ------------------------------
>  If you reply to this email, your message will be added to the discussion
> below:
>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/o-a-w-util-license-package-in-production-source-folder-tp3742291p3742539.html
>  To start a new topic under Apache Wicket, email
> [email protected]
> To unsubscribe from Apache Wicket, click 
> here<http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/template/NamlServlet.jtp?macro=unsubscribe_by_code&node=1842946&code=amNnYXJjaWFtQGdtYWlsLmNvbXwxODQyOTQ2fDEyNTYxMzc3ODY=>.
>
>



-- 

JC


--
View this message in context: 
http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/o-a-w-util-license-package-in-production-source-folder-tp3742291p3742824.html
Sent from the Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at 
Nabble.com.

Reply via email to