- Refactor things out of WicketFilter (and removing any direct dependency on it from the core processing), so that we could tweak the request processing cycle (more low-level things, that are not possible with RequestCycleListeners) without having to patch its source code. The way things are now, it is a big blob of code with lots of private/final methods, impossible to customize.
On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 10:33 AM, tetsuo <ronald.tet...@gmail.com> wrote: > - I echo the .setOutput*() thing. There should be some global setting for > these. > > - some preparation for Java 8/closures support (Single-Method Interfaces) > > - more/refined debug tools > > - revive portlet support > > > > On Wed, Aug 31, 2011 at 9:26 AM, Korbinian Bachl - privat < > korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > >> My wish list: >> >> 1. Java 6 >> >> 2. JEE6 where possible like e.g. CDI; >> >> 3. Modularization using OSGI >> >> 4. AJAX overhaul: currently Ajax is a pain in case it gets more >> complicated as one >> -> needs to add components to target AND page hierarchy; >> -> needs to do .setOutput****Id(true) all over >> -> can't touch "invisible" containers in e.g.: DataTable >> >> 5. look at side-efforts done by matej, igor and co to bring the nice >> things to wicket and enhance/ or replace the affected counterparts of wicket >> (e.g.: DataTable vs. InMethod Grid; bindgen-wicket etc.) >> >> 6. Not 100% sure: let the HTML templates feed via a single place so one >> can switch to e.g. a JCR implementation - however, I dont know how this >> could work in conjunction with added jars etc. to path. Idea is to allow the >> templates to live outside the java part (e.g.: CMS); >> >> 7. @RequireHTTPS logic overhaul (currently: either must use SSL or mustn't >> use SSL, no "may use SSL"); >> >> >> >> Am 30.08.11 00:12, schrieb Martijn Dashorst: >> >> In order to start discussing what will constitute Wicket Next and >>> where we want to take our beloved framework, I'll start off with my >>> wish list: >>> >>> 1. Java 6 as a minimum requirement for *all* of wicket >>> 2. Servlet API 3.0 as a minimum requirement >>> 3. JavaEE 6 support for at least CDI >>> 4. Proper OSGi support >>> 5. Ajax refactoring to use JQuery and provide proper JQuery integration >>> in core >>> 6. Shorter release cycle >>> >>> I +1000 #1 in my wish list, since then I'll be able to build releases >>> again. >>> >>> Regarding #6 I aim to release Wicket 6 final in December. >>> >>> Martijn >>> >> >