+1 for release, +0 for beta vs milestone. -igor
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote: > Since we are going to follow semver.org let's call it 6.0.0-beta1. > I believe it is more stable to be alpha. > > Please vote for M1 or beta1 so Igor can start the release process. > > [x] 6.0.0-beta1 (I'm for beta1) > [] 6.0.0-m1 > [] you name it > > On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Martijn Dashorst > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Looks like a plan. >> >> Martijn >> >> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:49 AM, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> >> wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> What do you think about a release of 6.0 as a milestone this week ? >>> Looking at Jira I see only CDI integration as something bigger but >>> afaik it wont bring any API breaks, it will just add a new >>> module/functionality. >>> I'm also helping Andreas Pieber in providing better integration for >>> OSGi. Hopefully this wont require API breaks. >>> >>> I'd like to release a milestone or two before the release candidates >>> because we wont be able to fix or improve the APIs in the RCs. >>> We had a few API changes in 1.5 RCs and this made some users more or >>> less not happy. Let's try to avoid this this time. >>> I also would like to ask Wicket devs to spend some time and review the >>> new stuff (code, migration page, docs) if they didn't so far. Their >>> feedback is most valuable! >>> >>> -- >>> Martin Grigorov >>> jWeekend >>> Training, Consulting, Development >>> http://jWeekend.com >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com
