Ok, I thought due to the fact that there are quite a few projects
uncommented in the pom with the hint that those still needs to be ported
to wicket 6 that the other projects (which are not referenced) should
not be ported to wicket 6 any more.
I will have a closer look at them when I find some time.
Joachim
On 08/10/2012 09:16 AM, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi Joachim,
Some projects are not migrated to Wicket 6 and that's why they are
excluded from the parent pom.xml.
When someone needs a project (s)he migrates it and re-enables it in
the parent pom.xml.
Why a project is not removed - because you don't know when someone
would volunteer to migrate it.
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:33 PM, Joachim Rohde
<[email protected]> wrote:
Hello,
while I was working on the wicketstuff project I realized that the master
branch contains a lot of projects which are not referenced in the POM (e.g.
artworks, ddcalendar, syringe, etc.). Those projects are also not in the
out-commented section because they still need to be ported to wicket 6.
Does anyone know the reason why those projects are not referenced in the
POM? Should those projects not be ported to Wicket 6 (in which case I would
ask myself why they are not getting deleted from the master branch)? Or are
those projects just 'forgotten'?
Anyone know more about this? (I'm just asking out of curiosity).
Joachim
