Can't you just use #getChainedModel()? Sven
Greg Johnson <[email protected]> schrieb: >hi, > >for some validator use cases public getTarget() in AbstractPropertyModel was >important for access to the parent object, eg for cross field validation. > >this is now not possible in 6.x as getTarget() is now protected in >ChainingModel and this breaks the above validator use case. > >just like may 10 2007 Inspecting Property Models >(http://wicket-dev.markmail.org/message/xy7edh2kghweab2p?q=gettarget+propertymodel) > ... it is possible to create a subclass but it's pretty restrictive and >unfortunate that users are forced to use a non-standard property model. > >given the implementation of ProperyModel is already exposed with >propertyExpression(), is it possible to also expose the parent object with >public getTarget() as per 1.5.6, in either ChainingModel or PropertyModel? > >thanks, > >regards, >greg johnson >
