Congratulations!
But this is still weld only isn't? So you are basically doomed on every Apache stack like TomEE, Geronimo, OWB, OpenEJB, KarafEE, etc As already mentioned a few months back, I suggest to get rid of the direct weld dependencies and use the deltaspike-cdictrl abstraction instead. It provides a generic API for controlling CDI containers plus various exchangeable impls for binding to Weld, OpenWebBeans, etc LieGrue, strub ----- Original Message ----- > From: Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> > To: us...@wicket.apache.org; dev@wicket.apache.org; annou...@wicket.apache.org > Cc: > Sent: Tuesday, September 11, 2012 7:08 PM > Subject: [announce] Wicket-CDI for Wicket 6.0.0 released > > A Wicket 6.0 compatible version of the wicket-cdi module has been > released and is available via Maven. It is also becoming an official > module and will be bundled with Wicket starting with 6.1.0 release. > More details here: > > https://www.42lines.net/2012/09/11/status-of-wicket-cdi-module/ > > -igor > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscr...@wicket.apache.org > For additional commands, e-mail: users-h...@wicket.apache.org >
