On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 11:51 PM, Bruno Borges <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, can't tell that wicket-cdi is a "new feature" to Wicket, as it is a > separate module, and I don't think there are dependent changes on Wicket's > core. > > We can run wicket 6.0.0 with wicket-cdi. The only issue here is that it is > in a different groupId (thanks Igor and 42lines). > > So how about that?
The official org.apache.wicket:wicket-cdi module will be in 6.1.0. Until then you can use net.ftlines:wicket-cdi with Wicket 1.5.x/6.0.0 > > > *Bruno Borges* > (11) 99564-9058 > *www.brunoborges.com* > > > > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Emond Papegaaij > <[email protected]>wrote: > >> 6.0.1, if released, cannot contain any new features, only bugfixes, as >> dictated by semver. wicket-cdi will be part of 6.1.0. >> >> Best regards, >> Emond >> >> On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 10:41 PM, Bruno Borges <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > I'd like to have a 6.0.1 release, just because of wicket-cdi officialy on >> > its distribution. >> > >> > >> > >> > *Bruno Borges* >> > (11) 99564-9058 >> > *www.brunoborges.com* >> > >> > >> > >> > On Fri, Sep 21, 2012 at 5:29 PM, Emond Papegaaij < >> [email protected] >> >> wrote: >> > >> >> Hi all, especially Martijn, >> >> >> >> Martijn, you proposed to build 6.1.0 today. I know you probably won't >> >> get to it today and I also think it's better to give people a few more >> >> days to fix urgent tickets. 6.0.1 still has 2 major unresolved >> >> tickets. Given the fact that everyone voted for 6.1.0 to be the next >> >> release, we should probably close 6.0.1 and move all tickets from >> >> 6.0.1 to 6.1.0. >> >> >> >> Does anyone object to a 6.1.0 release next week, let's say tuesday? >> >> Martijn, if you do not have to time to do the release yourself, >> >> perhaps you can help me do it? >> >> >> >> Best regards, >> >> Emond >> >> >> -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com
