On Wed, Sep 26, 2012 at 3:49 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > It should be 2012, no ?
Actually only if anything copyrightable was added to or changed in such files. IIRC the idea is also to not include a year in source files, or not auto-update them at the year change. Copyright law is strange that way. I don't think it is a holdup for the release though. Martijn
