I think it is just a matter of notifying the webjars maintainer that there is a new version. I just did a couple of minutes ago and James responded immediately. (https://github.com/webjars/webjars/issues/34).
regz, /dd 2012/11/25 Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> > On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 2:51 PM, Martijn Dashorst < > [email protected] > > wrote: > > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 10:42 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > No one objected so I've just updated jQuery to 1.8.2 for Wicket 6.3.0. > > > > Would it be prudent to switch to webjars [1,2] instead for including > > jquery? This would open up managing jquery through maven dependency > > resolution instead of having to upgrade wicket itself. > > > > Martijn > > > > [1] http://webjars.org > > [2] > > http://search.maven.org/#search%7Cga%7C1%7Cg%3Aorg.webjars%20a%3Ajquery > > > > jQuery 1.8.3 has been released at Nov 13, 2012 and there is no new webjar > for it. > For now it seems to be much simpler to handle this dependency management as > we do it. > > > > -- > Martin Grigorov > jWeekend > Training, Consulting, Development > http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/> > -- /* Spelin donut mader if iz ina coment */
