Hi Sebastien, Please file a ticket.
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 3:45 PM, Sebastien <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Ernesto, > > Technically speaking, it is possible to achieve the same using a div, or > even in a body script, but I do not like this idea too much. Using a header > contribution (with an head script) is the proper way to add a jQuery > template to the DOM... > > But the main question is: should Wicket assume that a script header > contribution has a javascript content in any case? > As I said earlier, a script tag does not necessarily contains javascript. > It is the default scripting language for HTML5 (meaning type can be striped > from declaration) but there is a number of different possible values. > > As for "official" values we can find: > text/javascript > text/ecmascript > text/vbscript > text/tcl > > And for the known custom script mine type, at least: > text/x-handlebars > text/x-jquery-tmpl > text/x-kendo-template > text/x-underscore-template > > That's the reason why I opened this thread because I think it is a > limitation that should be handled... > > Thanks & best regards, > Sebastien. > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hi Sebastien, > > > > Wouldn't it be possible to achieve the same with a hidden div? > > > > On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 12:39 PM, Sebastien <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > Dear Wicket's dev team, > > > > > > A user of wicket-jquery-ui, reported me an issue which is related to an > > > ajax inline javascript header contribution (when src attribute is not > > set) > > > https://github.com/sebfz1/wicket-jquery-ui/issues/20 > > > > > > In wicket-ajax-jquery.js, #processScript assume that an inline script > > > should be added using Wicket.Head.addJavascript (in opposition to > > > Wicket.Head.addElement > > > for outline script) > > > The problem is that #addJavascript modifies the script content in any > > > case (content > > > = 'try{'+content+'}catch(e){Wicket.Log.error(e);}';), but a script > > element > > > does not necessary contains content that is designed to be executed, > that > > > the case of a jQuery Template for instance where the tag signature look > > > like <script id="jquery-template-116997860" type="text/x-jquery-tmpl"> > > > > > > I think that #processScript should ensure that the mime type is > > > 'text/javascript' before calling #addJavascript. If the mime type is > > > different, #addElement should be called rather than #addJavascript > > > Another option - if you want to prevent potential issues for user not > > > specifying the script's mime type - could be to bypass scripts (means > not > > > calling #addJavascript but #addElement) having their mime type starting > > > with "text/x-", which is a convention for custom script type. > > > > > > Would you like me to open a jira ? > > > > > > Thanks in advance, > > > Sebastien. > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > Antilia Soft > > http://antiliasoft.com/ <http://antiliasoft.com/antilia> > > > -- Martin Grigorov jWeekend Training, Consulting, Development http://jWeekend.com <http://jweekend.com/>
