Thanks! I'll take a look. You may have noticed that now there are JS functional tests for the CDI pages in wicket-examples too
On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 11:08 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]>wrote: > we use a custom solution at $dayjob, but its so tired to our > environment it would be hard to repackage. maybe we can use this: > http://jglue.org/cdi-unit/ but i havent tried it yet. > > -igor > > On Mon, Jun 10, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > Hi Igor & Emond, > > > > At the moment we don't have any tests for wicket-cdi module. > > Do you use something similar for testing your application(s) like what > > Cedric suggested in users@ or you use something with mocks like Spring's > > ApplicationContextMock that we have. > > With Guice it is also very easy to use a Module with bindings needed only > > for the particular test. > > There is no need to emulate application container to run your > Spring/Guice > > tests. > > > > I doubt that Arquilian is the only option for testing CDI based apps. > But I > > don't have experience with CDI myself. > > I'll be glad to add some tests for wicket-cdi(-1.1) module. > > > > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > > From: Cedric Gatay <[email protected]> > > Date: Sun, Jun 2, 2013 at 8:57 PM > > Subject: Re: WicketTester CDI and WicketApplication > > To: [email protected] > > > > > > Hi David, > > you can have a look at the base CDI enabled test class we're using at > > code-troopers in the following gist : > > https://gist.github.com/CedricGatay/5694293 > > > > Regards, > > > > __ > > Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay <http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay>) > > http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | > http://cedric.gatay.fr > > > > > > On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 6:15 PM, David Beer <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> Hi Cedric > >> > >> Thanks for the reply I will take a look at Arquillian and see how I can > >> use it. Any guides are helpful especially when used with wicket. > >> > >> Thanks > >> > >> David > >> > >> On 01/06/13 16:20, Cedric Gatay wrote: > >> > >>> Hi, > >>> > >>> I usually use Arquillian to deploy a CDI context in my tests which > >>> require > >>> injection to work (often it happens for pages tests). When testing > >>> individual components it is easy to "manually" inject references > (either > >>> via package visibility or via PowerMock's Whitebox for instance). > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> > >>> __ > >>> Cedric Gatay (@Cedric_Gatay > >>> <http://twitter.com/Cedric_**Gatay<http://twitter.com/Cedric_Gatay> > >>> >) > >>> > >>> http://code-troopers.com | http://www.bloggure.info | > >>> http://cedric.gatay.fr > >>> > >>> > >>> On Sat, Jun 1, 2013 at 5:13 PM, David Beer <[email protected]> > >>> wrote: > >>> > >>> Hi All > >>>> > >>>> I am having difficulty finding information on how I can create a CDI > >>>> context for use in my tests. Is there some kind of way of creating a > >>>> mock > >>>> cdi environment for testing. Currently my tests fail trying to > retrieve > >>>> the > >>>> CDI Bean Manager as this is normally controlled by the Web Application > >>>> Container. > >>>> > >>>> Do I need to create a mock Web Application class which simulates a > dummy > >>>> Bean Manager? Is there any guides specific to Wicket? > >>>> > >>>> Thanks > >>>> > >>>> David > >>>> > >>>> ------------------------------****----------------------------** > >>>> --**--------- > >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >>>> users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apa**che.org<http://apache.org> > >>>> > >>>> <users-unsubscribe@**wicket.apache.org< > [email protected]> > >>>> > > >>>> > >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >> > >> > ------------------------------**------------------------------**--------- > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: > >> users-unsubscribe@wicket.**apache.org< > [email protected]> > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected] > >> > >> > > >
