On Friday 26 July 2013 15:02:08 Martin Grigorov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 2:52 PM, Hendy Irawan <he...@soluvas.com> 
wrote:
> > Thanks Martin.
> > 
> > In short, Jean-Francois Arcand delayed Atmosphere 1.1 into 2.0 and 
it's
> > probably breaking compatibility with 1.0.
> > 
> > 
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/atmosphere-framework/1
> > d2Qu7f1rYo
> > 
> > https://groups.google.com/forum/#!searchin/atmosphere-framework/2.0/atmosp
> > here-framework/blwCZUxLKZA/sZqclpGwDGAJ
> > 
> > Atmosphere 2.0.RC2 will be released tomorrow.
> > 
> > (Note to self:) propose Wicket 7 WebApplication to initialize a built-in
> > AtmosphereEventBus. So @Subscribe is directly usable out-of-the-box
> > without
> > additional config.
> 
> I don't use Wicket Atmosphere in any app so I don't have much 
experience
> with it but I think the config is required by Atmosphere, not by Wicket.
> 

You are right, the only config needed by Wicket is the creation and 
registration of the event bus. It might be possible to move the Atmosphere 
configuration files to wicket-atmosphere, but that would probably make it 
impossible to provide custom Atmosphere configuration.

> > So yeah I would love to see wicket-atmosphere merged into wicket 
core :)
> 
> Wicket Atmosphere is not very well maintained.
> Emond has no much time for Open Source development lately. And I 
think no
> one else from core team uses it in their apps.
> But Wicket-Atmosphere won't be merged in to core. It may go out of
> experimental mode, but not merged into core.
> 

Wicket-atmosphere will never be merged into core. Only dependency free 
code will be put in core; code that only uses the servlet spec. Perhaps, 
someday, Atmosphere itself will become redundant and we can put push 
support in core, but not yet.

> > Re: the issue quickstarts, coming soon in shaa Allah :)
> 
> Tickets with quickstarts have much higher chance to be resolved sooner 
than
> ones without quickstart app attached ;-)

Tickets with pull requests are even more likely to be resolved soon :) As 
Martin said, my time on Wicket is very limited. I'll take a look at the tickets 
today, but I can't promise anything. I strive to merge pull requests within a 
few days though (if they are any good that is :) ).

Best regards,
Emond

> 
> > --
> > View this message in context:
> > http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Wicket7-Core-support-for-server
> > -side-push-WebSocket-via-Atmosphere-tp4660503p4660506.html Sent 
from the
> > Forum for Wicket Core developers mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to