Should do the job! Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting
On Mon, Jan 20, 2014 at 3:07 PM, Martijn Dashorst < [email protected]> wrote: > While we are probably making the amount of experimental modules > minimal, we have to consider the issue of developing experimental > modules in both wicket 6 and wicket 7. > > I propose to move all (remaining) experimental modules into a new > groupid for both wicket 6 and 7: > > Wicket 6 experimental modules would live in: > > org.apache.wicket.experimental.wicket-6.x:... > > Wicket 7 experimental modules would live in: > > org.apache.wicket.experimental.wicket-7.x:... > > But the local module path would remain the same (as would be the version). > > So for arguments sake, if we were to keep wicket-bootstrap in > experimental, we would release: > > org.apache.wicket.experimental.wicket-6.x:wicket-bootstrap:0.20 > > and > > org.apache.wicket.experimental.wicket-7.x:wicket-bootstrap:0.20 > > This will solve the issue of overlapping release versions. > > WDYT? > > Martijn >
