As long as the PR is recorded on a wicket.apache.org list (for wicket PR's of course), it should be OK-provided the patch is small. This could be dev@or commits@. It should be traceable on Apache controlled hardware.
If anyone wishes to contribute often, it would be easier to send a signed CLA to the secretary. Whgen the contributions continue and become more contrived, the path to committership is already paved then. Note that The Apache Software Foundation licenses the code from you, you keep copyright on the original-there is NO copyright assignment when signing and submitting the CLA. Martijn On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:25 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>wrote: > compare to: > wget http://.../pr/8.patch > git am 8.patch > git commit -a && git push > > > both can be automated with some .sh script but GitHub UI is not very > friendly - it doesn't give you easy way to copy the author's name and her > branch > > I tried once https://github.com/github/hub but it failed too ... > > I just haven't tried hard enough ... > > > Apache Org says: if the patch is not very big then just the fact that the > user created PR is enough to give up her ownership > if the patch is rather big then Apache requires signed CLA before merging > the code > > > On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 9:13 AM, Martin Funk <[email protected]> wrote: > > > several steps???? > > > > git remote add foo <git-repo-url> > > git fetch foo > > git checkout -b foo/<branch-witch-patch> > > git rebase master > > git checkout master > > git merge foo/<branch-with-patch> > > git push ... > > > > > > either way, what is the Apache policy on that? Shouldn't each and every > > code snipped be signed of to meet Apache Licence???? > > > > > > mf > > Am 12.02.2014 um 21:44 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: > > > > > On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 7:12 PM, Martin Funk <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > >>> Pull Requests are still not supported. > > >> But they could be pulled to local and then pushed to the apache repo > by > > >> core commiters, right? > > >> > > > > > > Right, but it involves "manual" work in several steps. > > > For me the easiest way is to add '.patch' to the PR url, download it > and > > > 'git am' it. This losses the author info though... > > > > > > > > >> > > >> mf > > >> > > >> Am 12.02.2014 um 09:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected] > >: > > >> > > >>> Don't get too excited :) > > >>> It is just about mail notifications and comments in JIRA/GitHub. > > >>> Pull Requests are still not supported. > > >>> > > >>> Martin Grigorov > > >>> Wicket Training and Consulting > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 9:48 AM, Santo Raso <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Finally!!!! > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> 2014-02-12 9:00 GMT+01:00 Jeremy Thomerson < > [email protected] > > >: > > >>>> > > >>>>> Yes! > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> On Wed, Feb 12, 2014 at 2:18 AM, Martin Grigorov < > > [email protected] > > >>>>>> wrote: > > >>>>> > > >>>>>> Hi, > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Just noticed > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > > https://blogs.apache.org/infra/entry/improved_integration_between_apache_and > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> We want all of it, right ?! > > >>>>>> > > >>>>>> Martin Grigorov > > >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting > > >>>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> > > >>>>> -- > > >>>>> Jeremy Thomerson > > >>>>> http://wickettraining.com > > >>>>> > > >>>> > > >> > > >> > > > > > -- Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
