On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:44 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: > Additionally to the var-args vs array decision, I don't like that we are > using MessageFormat for this: it has a foreign syntax {0}, it's index-based > and it doesn't work with Wicket converters.
The one problem I see is that MessageFormat is pretty much canonical. At €work we are juggling how to do I18N in our rest backend and our Wicket frontend... We don't have Wicket available in the backend so we are **forced** (ahum) to use resource bundles and message format at that point. Having one message format across both backend and frontend is beneficial. Martijn
