One can build a controller to manage all the onConfigure(xx) but the wicket framework does not provide a controller so basically it's left for the developer.
** Martin 2014-11-02 17:52 GMT+02:00 Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]>: > On Sun, Nov 2, 2014 at 4:37 PM, andrea del bene <[email protected]> > wrote: > > I don't even get why we find "active record pattern" for Grails...BTW, > > strictly speaking Wicket has no "controller" part so we might say no for > > MVC. In any case anything would be better than the current description :) > > We have: the component. It acts as both the controller and the view, > so we are a Model2 framework! > > Or else we could say the RequestCycle is the controller but I think > that is a stretch... > > Martijn >
