I'd suggest to move -datetime to WicketStuff and add a ticket to improve
the DateConverter in -utils with timezone support for Wicket 8.
Sooner 7.0.0 is released, sooner we can start working on Wicket 8 that will
depend on JDK 8.
WDYT ?

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 3:49 PM, Martijn Dashorst <[email protected]
> wrote:

> I'd rather upgrade to java 8 than depend on jodatime in core. Jodatime
> is a stopgap until java 8 gains enough traction.
>
> Martijn
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> > Sorry, I was mistaken by another pair of namesake classes named
> > DateConverter.... DateTextField from extensions module uses DateConverter
> > from utils module, not the one from datetime. So in short, I agree to
> > decommission datetime and move it as it is to wicketstuff. The only minor
> > thing I'm concerned of is that DateConverter from utils doesn't seem to
> be
> > able to take the time zone difference between clients and the server into
> > account. So it might be nice to keep such a DateConvert as part of Wicket
> > distribution. It would be easy to add another date converter for this
> > purpose (for example TimeZoneDateConverter) coping the one from datetime.
> > The only downside of this solution is that we must move the dependency on
> > Joda to utils module...
> >
> >> I was thinking:
> >> a) move the module from Apache Wicket master branch to WicketStuff
> master
> >> branch
> >> b) explain in the migration guide that the Maven dependency and the
> >> package
> >> names have changed from X to Y
> >>
> >> But with all the suggestions to move and merge classes I am not so sure
> >> that the migration process will be very smooth for the end user
> >>
> >> Martin Grigorov
> >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 4:42 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
>

Reply via email to