Github user martin-g commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/97#discussion_r26283695
--- Diff:
wicket-core/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/resource/CssUrlReplacer.java ---
@@ -71,21 +82,67 @@ else if (imageCandidateUrl.isContextAbsolute())
// relativize against the url for the
containing CSS file
Url cssUrlCopy = new Url(cssUrl);
cssUrlCopy.resolveRelative(imageCandidateUrl);
- PackageResourceReference imageReference = new
PackageResourceReference(scope,
- cssUrlCopy.toString());
- processedUrl = cycle.urlFor(imageReference,
null);
+
+ // if the image should be processed as URL or
base64 embedded
+ if (cssUrlCopy.getQueryString() != null &&
+
cssUrlCopy.getQueryString().contains(EMBED_BASE64))
+ {
+ embedded = true;
+ PackageResourceReference imageReference
= new PackageResourceReference(scope,
+
cssUrlCopy.toString().replace("?" + EMBED_BASE64, ""));
+ try
+ {
+ processedUrl =
createBase64EncodedImage(imageReference);
+ }
+ catch (Exception e)
+ {
+ throw new
WicketRuntimeException(
+ "Error while embedding
an image into the css: " +
+
imageReference.toString(), e);
--- End diff --
no need of `toString()`. It is called implicitly.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enabled but not working, please
contact infrastructure at infrastruct...@apache.org or file a JIRA ticket
with INFRA.
---
