https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5887
Martin Grigorov Wicket Training and Consulting https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov On Sun, Apr 19, 2015 at 3:11 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi, > > Thanks John! > Indeed this is the problem. > http://www.w3.org/MarkUp/SCHEMA/xhtml-basic-form-1.xsd defines the > original with '.' > > Martin Grigorov > Wicket Training and Consulting > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 4:54 PM, John Sarman <[email protected]> wrote: > >> It complies fine if you change line 86 from >> <attributeGroup ref="xhtml.label:attlist"/> >> to >> <attributeGroup ref="xhtml.label.attlist"/> >> >> It looks like a simple typo. I haven't checked it any further. >> >> -- >> John >> >> >> On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 6:56 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > Hi, >> > >> > I see the same and other problems when parsing the xsd with different >> > validators :/. >> > >> > My knowledge of XSDs is limited and the error messages are rather >> cryptic. >> > >> > Regards >> > Sven >> > >> > Am 15.04.2015 um 16:10 schrieb Sebastien: >> > >> >> Hi devs, >> >> >> >> My Eclipse is complaining about wicket.xsd. >> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket- >> >> core/src/main/resources/META-INF/wicket.xsd#L86 >> >> >> >> Multiple annotations found at this line: >> >> - s4s-att-must-appear: Attribute 'ref' must appear in element >> >> 'attributeGroup (local)'. >> >> - s4s-elt-must-match.1: The content of 'xhtml.label.attlist' must >> >> match >> >> (annotation?, >> >> ((attribute | attributeGroup)*, anyAttribute?)). A problem was >> found >> >> starting at: attributeGroup. >> >> >> >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/wicket/blob/master/wicket- >> >> core/src/main/resources/META-INF/wicket.xsd#L91 >> >> >> >> src-attribute.4: Attribute 'for' has both a 'type' attribute and an >> >> anonymous 'simpleType' child. Only one of these is allowed for an >> >> attribute. >> >> >> >> >> >> I am not an xsd expert, but it sounds like to be justified, but am I >> the >> >> only one in this case? (I admit I didn't had loaded wicket core >> since... >> >> weeks at least ! ;) ) >> >> >> >> >> >> Thanks & best regards, >> >> Sebastien. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >
