.. @IReadOnlyModel: i hope, it will be easier to change then the last time i tried it. Watch out for component default model stuff...
:) Am 6. Oktober 2015 22:54:37 MESZ, schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: >On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 10:43 PM, Andrew Geery <[email protected]> >wrote: > >> If IModel were a @FunctionalInterface, then you wouldn't need >something >> like a SupplierModel; you could just use a lambda directly: >> >> new Label("label", () -> "The current time is " + LocalDate.now()); >> > >This looks good indeed. >It seems we will add IReadOnlyModel soon! > > >> >> And since IModel is Serializable, the lambda will be too, without >having to >> have an artificial interface that is both Serializable & a Supplier. >> >> Thanks >> Andrew >> >> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015 at 4:21 PM, Martin Grigorov ><[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > Same for IRequestHandler#detach() >> > >> > Martin Grigorov >> > Wicket Training and Consulting >> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> > >> > On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 10:42 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >> > [email protected]> wrote: >> > >> > > Should we use an empty default implementation for IModel#detach? >> > > >> > > >> > > public class IModel<T> extends IDetachable >> > > { >> > > ... >> > > >> > > @Override >> > > default void detach() >> > > { >> > > } >> > > } >> > > >> > > This won't break existing applications, but might make it a bit >easier >> > > on the eyes to implement IModel directly. >> > > >> > > I'm not in favor of applying the default method to IDetachable, >> > > because that would defeat the interface's purpose IMO. >> > > >> > > WDYT? >> > > >> > > Martijn >> > > >> > >> -- Diese Nachricht wurde von meinem Android-Mobiltelefon mit K-9 Mail gesendet.
