Hi,

Is this feature included (or supposed to be) in the 7.1.0 staging release
of yesterday?

Thanks & best regards,
Sebastien.

On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 11:31 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Thanks for the responses!
>
> I'll work on 1.1
>
> Martin Grigorov
> Wicket Training and Consulting
> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 1:38 PM, Martijn Dashorst <
> [email protected]> wrote:
>
> > 1.1 for me as well
> >
> > Martijn
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2015 at 12:33 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > I'd prefer solution 1.1:
> > >
> > > - the old solution worked fine, but the properties couldn't be merged
> for
> > > uberjar (but nothing I ever worried about)
> > > - the current solution is flawed, we should get rid of it as soon as
> > > possible
> > > - ServiceLoader seems to be a simple working standard.
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > Sven
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 13.10.2015 21:28, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Hi devs,
> > >>
> > >> There are some issues with the new code for scanning for
> > wicket.properties
> > >> in 7.0.0:
> > >> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5997 (also discussed
> at
> > >>
> > >>
> >
> http://stackoverflow.com/questions/33043321/has-anybody-been-able-to-run-wicket-7-0-0-on-websphere-liberty-profile-8-5-5-7
> > >> )
> > >> - https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/138
> > >>
> > >> At both reports ServiceLoader (SL) is suggested as a better solution
> for
> > >> this functionality.
> > >> When I implemented the current solution I've ignored SL because I
> > remember
> > >> having issues with it in OSGi environment and I've preferred the
> current
> > >> solution because it works well for WebJars.
> > >>
> > >> Adding support for SL is easy. The problem is what to do with the
> > current
> > >> solution.
> > >> I see these solutions:
> > >>
> > >> 1. Add support for SL and "deprecate" the current solution by logging
> > >> WARNs
> > >> 1.1. Log WARNs for several releases and then drop the current solution
> > >> 1.2. Log WARNs until Wicket 8.0.0
> > >> 2. Add support for SL and remove the current solution for the next
> > release
> > >>
> > >> At the moment we log WARN when the old /wicket.properties is detected
> on
> > >> the classpath!
> > >>
> > >> I am for 1.1 because the current solution is buggy (in uberjar and
> OSGi
> > >> envs) and there is no point to support it. But at the same time I see
> > that
> > >> this would be a bigger change that probably should wait for major
> > release.
> > >>
> > >> Opinions?
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Martin Grigorov
> > >> Wicket Training and Consulting
> > >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> >
>

Reply via email to