I would prefer to get 7.2.0 without this issue On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 4:01 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < [email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Martin, > > as I expected the PRs are fixing the issue - yeeeeees ;-) > > I created a tomcat 7 application. Copied the war file with: > > scp -i openshift wicket-examples.war <id>@wicket-klopfdreh.rhcloud.com: > ~/jbossews/webapps/ > > watched the log after login with: > > ssh -i openshift <id>@wicket-klopfdreh.rhcloud.com > > Here the link to check: > > http://wicket-klopfdreh.rhcloud.com/wicket-examples/videos/ > > kind regards > > Tobias > > P.S.: So if there are any reports that the playback of videos are not > working in Safari - it is fixed with Wicket 7.3.0 then. Or other option > would be to merge the PRs and release 7.2.0 with those fixes. > > Am 25.12.15 um 15:12 schrieb Martin Grigorov: > >> Hi Tobias, >> >> This won't help. >> The release is already in a branch in Martijn's GitHub fork. This is what >> we vote on now. >> Any changes in 7.x will go to 7.3.0 unless the vote is cancelled due to >> some serious problem. >> >> Did you deploy wicket-examples 7.2.0-SNAPSHOT with your changes to >> OpenShift to verify that they actually fix the problem with Safari? >> You said that Safari works fine with examples running locally. >> Before you verify the fix we cannot be sure that this is actually the >> problem. >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consulting >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 2:41 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> @Martin should we integrate the fixes for video playback before release?! >>> I have some time, tomorrow? >>> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>> Am 25.12.2015 um 14:08 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> +1 to release! >>>> >>>> Tested: >>>> - our main application >>>> - Wicket Bootstrap >>>> - WicketStuff >>>> - Apache Isis (branch ISIS-1223-upgrade-to-wicket-7) >>>> >>>> Arquillian builds fine both here and at BuildBot. >>>> The problem with the ranges is not critical, IMO. It is like this since >>>> this code has been introduced and works in all browsers but Safari. >>>> There >>>> is no complain by real user for it yet. >>>> >>>> Martin Grigorov >>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>> >>>> On Fri, Dec 25, 2015 at 12:25 PM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>> [email protected] >>>> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Ubuntu 15.10, oracle JFK 7 latest, maven latest >>>>> Will try one more time tomorrow >>>>> >>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>> >>>>>> On Dec 25, 2015 16:36, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>> >>>>>> which is your environment? I have no problem with compilation using >>>>>> OpenJDK 7 and Maven 3.3.3. >>>>>> >>>>>> On 24/12/15 16:22, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> got following error while trying to compile: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <skipped> >>>>>>> Caused by: java.util.concurrent.TimeoutException: Managed server was >>>>>>> >>>>>> not >>> >>>> started within [60] s >>>>>>> at >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.managed.ManagedDeployableContainer.startInternal(ManagedDeployableContainer.java:204) >>> >>>> at >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> org.jboss.as.arquillian.container.CommonDeployableContainer.start(CommonDeployableContainer.java:112) >>> >>>> <skipped> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tests in error: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> InsertContactTest.org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.pages.InsertContactTest >>> >>>> » Lifecycle >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>> ArquillianContainerProvidedTest.org.apache.wicket.arquillian.testing.servletcontext.ArquillianContainerProvidedTest >>> >>>> » Runtime >>>>>>> >>>>>>> [INFO] Wicket JavaScript Tests ............................ SUCCESS [ >>>>>>> 0.352 s] >>>>>>> [INFO] Wicket Arquillian Testing .......................... FAILURE >>>>>>> >>>>>> [01:25 >>>>> >>>>>> min] >>>>>>> [INFO] Wicket User Guide .................................. SKIPPED >>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>> [INFO] BUILD FAILURE >>>>>>> [INFO] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------ >>> >>>> >>>>>>> should I ignore it? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 24, 2015 at 9:03 PM, Martijn Dashorst < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>> > -- WBR Maxim aka solomax
