@Martijn: are you interested in releasing 8.x as well or someone of us
should take over ?

Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov

On Tue, May 24, 2016 at 6:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi Martin,
>
> now I can imagine which kind of issues you mean. :-)
>
> Well - because JEE is processing very slow (you said it already) and there
> are some questions left regarding PushBuilder I think we could add the
> functionality as "experimental" module later on.
>
> +1 for release - but watch out there are some topics left to be discussed:
>
>
> http://apache-wicket.1842946.n4.nabble.com/Release-build-script-questions-affects-wicket-8-release-td4674516.html
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 24.05.2016 um 15:53 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>:
> >
> > Hi Tobias,
> >
> > Actually I've found a problem - I revert my statement!
> >
> > Consider: new Label("id", () -> dateFormatter.format(LocalDate.now))
> >
> > In Java this is resolved as Label(String, IModel) because Java lambdas
> are
> > not serializable and thus it cannot resolve to Label(String,
> Serializable)
> > constructor
> > In Scala the lambda is serializable and and the compiler uses
> Label(String,
> > Serializable).
> > Rendering this Label leads to: "((), 24/05/2016)". i.e. the lambda's
> > toString() is used.
> >
> >
> > But this is not so important.
> > The important thing is when we will release 8.0.0-M1 ?
> >
> > Martin Grigorov
> > Wicket Training and Consulting
> > https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >
> > On Sun, May 22, 2016 at 4:24 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> > [email protected]> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Martin,
> >>
> >> good to here, but why do you expected any issues in this case?
> >>
> >> kind regards
> >>
> >> Tobias
> >>
> >> Am 22.05.16 um 15:04 schrieb Martin Grigorov:
> >>
> >> Just updated one of my applications to Wicket 8.0.0-SNAPSHOT (and Scala
> >>> 2.12.0-M4)
> >>> The IModel works as a Scala lambda without any problems!
> >>>
> >>> Martin Grigorov
> >>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 6:59 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Oh sorry  -M1
> >>>>
> >>>> kind regards
> >>>>
> >>>> Tobias
> >>>>
> >>>>> Am 28.04.2016 um 16:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <[email protected]
> >:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2016 at 4:50 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
> >>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> @Andrea - Jep. I think it was that discussion about some model
> changes
> >>>>>> with lambda.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Anyway - Martin you are right JEE dev is slow - so +1 for RC
> >>>>> Milestone! Not Release Candidate!
> >>>>>
> >>>>> RC means we won't be able to make more API breaks.
> >>>>> Milestone is just a stable version that users could play with.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Am 28.04.2016 um 14:52 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <
> [email protected]>:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Are you refering to Matthias work?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Andrea.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On 27/04/2016 07:32, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
> >>>>>>>> Hi Martin,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I remember a discussion about further lambda improvements some
> days
> >>>>>>> ago. Shouldn't we wait until these suggestions are implemented?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Also what about Servlet 4.x - if we release now we can't switch to
> >>>>>>> PushBuilder API - can we?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Only some thoughts - WDYT
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> kind regards
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Tobias
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Am 27.04.2016 um 00:07 schrieb Martin Grigorov <
> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>> :
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think what we have so far in master branch is enough for
> releasing
> >>>>>>>> a
> >>>>
> >>>>> milestone.
> >>>>>>>>> Its purpose would be to collect some feedback on the lambdas and
> >>>>>>>> other
> >>>>
> >>>>> small improvements.
> >>>>>>>>> What do you think ?
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
> >>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
> >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
> >>
>

Reply via email to