Hi Sven, great! Let us hear from you if this works well or not! :-)
kind regards Tobias > Am 31.10.2016 um 15:24 schrieb Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net>: > > Hi, > > IMHO 8.x is ready to be promoted to final, as I don't see any additional > major changes for it. > > I'll be upgrading a big application from 6.x soon, and I'd love to target 8.x > instead of 7.x > > Sven > > >> Am 31.10.2016 um 14:41 schrieb Martin Grigorov: >> Hi, >> >> What other improvements do we need in 8.x/master before promoting it to >> 8.0.0 final ? >> >> At https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Ideas+for+Wicket+8.0 >> we still have: >> >> - new DateTime APIs for wicket-datetime *WICKET-6105 >> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6105>* - I'll give this one >> more try but the problem is that I don't believe this is the proper way and >> this demotivates me. >> If someone else wants to give it a try - please assign it to yourself! >> >> - Better SEO for stateful pages - the only way I see this is by using >> ServiceWorker to add the pageId as a request header to all requests (normal >> & Ajax) >> >> >> Recently I wondered whether Redux.js could be in use for Wicket. >> I don't have much experience with it, but both React and AngularJs >> communities use it to manage the state for their components. >> There are some Java impls, even a standard is coming: >> https://github.com/jvm-redux/jvm-redux-api >> >> What else ? >> >> Martin Grigorov >> Wicket Training and Consulting >> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >> >
