Github user theigl commented on the issue:

    https://github.com/apache/wicket/pull/246
  
    @svenmeier: This makes a lot of sense. I'm not sure however how much time 
I'll find the next weeks to work on this.
    
    I suggest the following approach:
    
    1. I'll look into this this week and try to rework the code as you 
suggested.
    2. If It takes too much time and I can't finish it, I vote for merging a 
very simple version of this PR that only applies the changes required for 
making `wicket-bean-validation` work with BV 2.0. I'll remove the API changes I 
introduced in `BeanValidationConfiguration` and hard-code the list of built-in 
annotations that imply a not-null constraint. This way, we do not introduce any 
new methods that we would later remove if your solution is implemented.
    
    WDYT?


---

Reply via email to