I'm happy with all latest changes (being continuously tested using our main
app)
I can address all Martin comments regarding #262-#264 and merge them

Would it be OK?
Can we start release process after this merging?

On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 5:12 AM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:

> Yes it is a very short description.
>
> So what I meant is that the client side uses the dynamic proxy which
> executes a rest action against the server and hand over class / parameters
> to the endpoint. The repsonse is automatically transfered into the business
> object with JSON. The server however accept the rest call and delegate
> everything to a given service by class / parameters. The response is sent
> to the client. RESTRPC. :-)
>
> And I mixed up CRUD with feign client:
>
> https://projects.spring.io/spring-cloud/spring-cloud.
> html#spring-cloud-feign
>
> kind regards
>
> Tobias
>
> > Am 06.02.2018 um 21:50 schrieb Martin Grigorov <
> [email protected]>:
> >
> > On Feb 6, 2018 21:45, "Tobias Soloschenko" <
> [email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I also like REST in combination with type safe interfaces.
> >
> > So what to do:
> >
> > 1. Put the type safe interfaces and transfer objects into a shared
> project
> >
> > 2. Build a rest call within a dynamic proxy (https://docs.oracle.com/
> > javase/7/docs/technotes/guides/reflection/proxy.html) with all required
> > handlings at one place - JSON can be used as serializer / deserializer to
> > the transfer objects
> >
> > 3. Invoke and have fun ;-)
> >
> > I think that is basically all what the spring framework CRUD
> > implementations are (of course with a bit more spring magic)
> >
> >
> > Which Spring CRUD implementations do you mean?
> >
> > Your explanation above is closer to RPC than to REST.
> > But the explanation is too short so I might have misunderstood you.
> >
> >
> > kind regards
> >
> > Tobias
> >
> >> Am 05.02.2018 um 11:39 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
> >>
> >> Another interesting source for official statements/answers is the
> article
> > I
> >> linked at the bottom of this message. It contains some good (and funny)
> >> critics to REST and what it promises to deliver.
> >>
> >> https://medium.freecodecamp.org/rest-is-the-new-soap-97ff6c09896d
> >>
> >> On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 10:43 AM, Korbinian Bachl <
> >> [email protected]> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Hello Kamil,
> >>>
> >>> be careful when using this feature in production as there is a race
> >>> condition meaning it depends on network, browser and client thread
> count
> > if
> >>> it works or not.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>> Von: "Kamil Paśko" <[email protected]>
> >>>> An: [email protected]
> >>>> Gesendet: Samstag, 3. Februar 2018 21:31:43
> >>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers
> >>>
> >>>> +1
> >>>>
> >>>> I could test this "deferred javascript" issue on real application
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> I'm for a new release too. We have a lot of fixes to release also for
> >>> 7.x
> >>>>> branch.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 11:50 AM, "Martin Grigorov" <
> [email protected]>
> >>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> On Feb 3, 2018 09:03, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>
> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Not sure if I can do more for the site update :(
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> @Martijn maybe you can provide text for the upcoming release?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> @All, I'm not real fan of it, but maybe it worth to release another
> >>> "M"?
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think it would be better to release another M or RC because there
> >>> were
> >>>>>> some bigger changes lately.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> WBR, Maxim
> >>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018, 16:25 Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I've updated copyright year. You don't see 2018 post because it
> has a
> >>>>>>> future date, but you can use flag future:true to show it.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 4:23 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have question regarding site generation.
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> I have added following file: 2018/_posts/2018-02-12-wicket-
> >>>>>>>> 8.0.0-released.md
> >>>>>>>> But news for 2018 are not being generated
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Is there any debugger I can use?
> >>>>>>>> Or maybe I miss something?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Copyright year is also 2017 :(
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Fri, Feb 2, 2018 at 12:09 AM, Sven Meier <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Hi Korbinian,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> no problem at all!
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> With the new JavaScriptFilteredHeaderResponse we can continue to
> >>>>>>> improve
> >>>>>>>>> deferred loading, without having to change anything in Wicket's
> > core
> >>>>>>> Ajax
> >>>>>>>>> handling.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Am 01.02.2018 um 17:39 schrieb Korbinian Bachl:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Im really sorry Sven but I broke your defer patch :/
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> see comment here:
> >>>>>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6498
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> A solution to it is provided :)
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Von: "Sven Meier" <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>> An: [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 1. Februar 2018 14:15:11
> >>>>>>>>>>> Betreff: Re: 8.0.0 blockers
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and Wicket6
> >>>>>> will
> >>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode?
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Yes I think so.
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Sven
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> ⁣Gesendet mit Blue
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Am 1. Feb. 2018, 14:00, um 14:00, Maxim Solodovnik <
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>> schrieb:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I have created wicket-8 branch in wicket-site repository.
> >>>>>>>>>>>> I believe the main work should be done in 2018/_posts/
> >>>>>>>>>>>> 2018-02-12-wicket-8.0.0-released.md file (I optimistically
> >>>>>> "guess"
> >>>>>>>>>>>> release
> >>>>>>>>>>>> date to be 2018-02-12 :))
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Weanwhile I'll update quickstart generator so it will work
> with
> >>>>>>>>>>>> "archetype:generate" 3.0.0+ and snapshot builds
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Am I right thinking Wicket 1.5 will be discontinued and
> Wicket6
> >>>>>> will
> >>>>>>>> be
> >>>>>>>>>>>> moved to "security updates only" mode?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 5:54 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>>>>> [email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> I've updated Confluence page to elaborate an answer to  "Not
> >>>>>>> blocking
> >>>>>>>>>>>> but
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> really important" TODOs for Wicket 8. The page is here
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+
> >>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Please consider to work directly on my comment
> >>>>>> integrating/changing
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> content of my post. This should help to come out with a final
> >>>>>>> version
> >>>>>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> our official announcement.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Thank you.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Jan 18, 2018 at 9:10 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Just seen it :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 18/01/2018 20:21, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> https://dzone.com/articles/would-you-use-jsf-for-your-next-project
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> This might be used for inspiration for possible questions.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Jan 17, 2018 at 5:52 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've created a Confluence page to collect some ideas on the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> non-technical
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> tasks we should accomplish before going to roll out Wicket
> 8.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I've
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> started
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> with some personal thoughts on topic 'JS vs Wicket'.
> Please
> >>>>>> take
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> them
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> as
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> a
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> raw sketch, something to use for further and better
> exposed
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> considerations
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> :-)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/ToDo+
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> before+GA+release
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 4:11 PM, Andrea Del Bene
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Uh sorry, I'm already able to create/edit pages.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 16, 2018 at 11:32 AM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I'd rather use Confluence but I think I don't have enough
> >>>>>>> rights
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> create a page. Who can grant them?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 8:13 PM, Martin Grigorov <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can use JIRA for this too.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Mon, Jan 15, 2018 at 5:53 PM, Andrea Del Bene <
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Could it be a good idea to create a shared document
> (for
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> example on
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Google
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Docs) to start working on non-technical questions?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Not blocking but really important:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Why not just use XXX.js?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java Server Side
> >>>>>> frameworks
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> dead?"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> - have a story to answer "Isn't Java dead"
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have a call list for when a reporter wants to have
> >>>>>> contact
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> about
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket 8
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> and its future (esp. related to questions above)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Other things to consider:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://wicketinaction.com
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>> WBR
> >>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
> >>>
>



-- 
WBR
Maxim aka solomax

Reply via email to