Yep! Branch wicket-9.x should be removed as it was "cherry-picked" into master. I will do it later or you can do it on your own.
On Thu, May 24, 2018, 1:36 PM Sebastien Briquet <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > I think this is because some preliminary investigations (or work) have been > done while wicket-8 was still master (I think it was about JDK-9) > So logically, wicket-9.x could or should be merged into master... > > But, the other question could also be, why do we have master at all? > > In Wicket jQuery UI, I was working on wicket8.x branch already and I will > remove master soon so I will only have wicket6.x, wicket7.x (prev master), > wicket8.x, and wicket9.x (soon). > It make more sense to me and there is no - potentially - weird rebase/merge > to do to master after each major version. > > Best regards, > Sebastien. > > > > > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 1:23 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < > [email protected]> wrote: > > > Hey guys, > > > > maybe I missed something, but why do we have master and wicket-9.x? > > > > I thought the latest version is master and all others are wicket-x.x. > > > > kind regards > > > > Tobias > > >
