On Sat, Nov 24, 2018, 12:03 Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected] wrote:

> Hello All,
>
> I'll try to list all @Deprecated classes/methods with some history.
>
> There are 118 blocks marked as Duplicated
>
> I believe those marked as `@Deprecated(since = "8.0", forRemoval = true)`
> can be removed (8 entries)
>
> Following blocks were @Deprecated in both wicket7 and wicket8
> org.apache.wicket.core.util.lang.WicketObjects.cloneModel(T)
> org.apache.wicket.markup.html.form.FormComponent.onRequired(ComponentTag)
>
> org.apache.wicket.markup.resolver.HtmlHeaderResolver.newHtmlHeaderContainer(String)
> org.apache.wicket.markup.WicketTag.getNameAttribute()
> org.apache.wicket.migrate.StringResourceModelMigration.of(String,
> Component, IModel<?>, Object...)
> org.apache.wicket.migrate.StringResourceModelMigration.of(String,
> Component, IModel<?>, String, Object...)
> org.apache.wicket.migrate.StringResourceModelMigration.of(String,
> IModel<?>, Object...)
> org.apache.wicket.migrate.StringResourceModelMigration.of(String,
> IModel<?>, String, Object...)
>
> org.apache.wicket.protocol.http.mock.MockHttpServletRequest.getRealPath(String)
> .......................................
>
> So I propose to
> 1) Drop all `@Deprecated(since = "8.0", forRemoval = true)` from master
> 2) Drop all marked as @Deprecated in wicket7 from both wicket8 and master
> (or at least from master)
>

+1 to remove both 1) and 2) from master only


> Can I?
>
>
>
> On Tue, 13 Nov 2018 at 13:47, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Maxim,
> >
> > Anything that is deprecated and has "WIll be removed in Wicket 9" could
> be
> > removed.
> > But there are some classes which are deprecated in 9 but should be
> removed
> > in 10.
> >
> > On Tue, Nov 13, 2018 at 6:09 AM Maxim Solodovnik <[email protected]>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hello All,
> > >
> > > I noticed there are some classes deprecated in 8.2.0 which exists in
> > 9.0.0
> > > (For example org.apache.wicket.util.crypt.Base64)
> > >
> > > I would like to remove them
> > >
> > > Are there any objections?
> > >
> > > --
> > > WBR
> > > Maxim aka solomax
> > >
> >
>
>
> --
> WBR
> Maxim aka solomax
>

Reply via email to