+ 1 to rework the documentation. EnclosureContainer should be the
recommended way. I'm not sure if we should completely remove
<wicket:enclosure>,but we should definitely make clear that it is not
suited for all use cases.
On 22/01/19 13:36, Martin Grigorov wrote:
Hi,
At
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6622?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels%3Acomment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=16748665#comment-16748665
a user suggests something that I like: to rework the documentation [1] to
use EnclosureContainer instead of <wicket:enclosure>.
if we want to keep some documentation about <wicket:enclosure> then it
should have a warning next to it saying that it doesn't work in some corner
cases.
WDYT ?
Martin
1.
https://ci.apache.org/projects/wicket/guide/8.x/single.html#_hiding_decorating_elements_with_the_wicket_enclosure_tag
