Hi Chris, I do agree with you! If no one objects I will move it in Wicket 9 in the coming days.
Regards, Martin On Mon, Jan 28, 2019 at 3:06 AM Chris Colman <chr...@stepaheadsoftware.com> wrote: > I recently found the need to override ChainingModel (Wicket 6.x) but > didn't need the extras that AbstractPropertyModel provided except for > getInnermostModelOrObject. > > Is there any reason why that method is in AbstractPropertyModel and not > ChainingModel? > > It appears that the method is purely in the domain of chaining and does > not have, as far as I can see, any dependencies on the concept of > property models. > > For our application I can copy/paste the method into our class that > extends ChainingModel but it got me wondering why it wasn't in > ChainingModel and if it [sh|c]ould be moved. > > Obviously it's not a show stopper or anything! > > Regards, > Chris Colman > http://pagebloom.com >
