On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 4:03 PM Emond Papegaaij <emond.papega...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I tend to agree with Martijn here. The Jakarta APIs are the future. It
> is unfortunate that the last stable version of Jetty is 4 years old
> now and they have not been able to produce a new version in the past 2
> years. Maybe us moving to servlet 4 will give them a bit more
> incentive to pick op the pace.
>

I am -0.
I don't see the urge for this change


>
> For the examples, it should not be that hard to use a jetty 10 milestone.
>
> Emond
>
> On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:41 PM Jeroen Steenbeeke
> <j.steenbeeke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Most of my Wicket applications (i.e. the ones I don't get paid to write)
> > run on Jetty 9.4, Java 11 and Wicket 8.
> >
> > Jetty 10 is, as indicated on the site I linked, still in alpha and marked
> > as unstable, and has no official Docker image yet.
> >
> > Right now there is nothing blocking me from adopting Wicket 9,
> introducing
> > servlet 4.0 would mean I cannot upgrade until Jetty stabilizes.
> >
> > - Jeroen
> >
> > Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 14:29 schreef Martijn Dashorst <
> > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 2:09 PM Jeroen Steenbeeke
> > > <j.steenbeeke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Jetty is still on 3.1:
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> https://www.eclipse.org/jetty/documentation/current/what-jetty-version.html
> > >
> > > Well, Emond was talking about the major application/servlet containers
> > > :-D...
> > >
> > > As we are targeting Java 11 with Wicket 9, perhaps 'ignoring' Jetty <=
> > > 9.x and aiming for Jetty 10 might not be *that* a big issue?
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > Op vr 10 jan. 2020 om 14:05 schreef Emond Papegaaij <
> > > > emond.papega...@gmail.com>:
> > > >
> > > > > It turns out Wicket 9 is still on servlet 3.1, which is
> pre-Jakarta.
> > > > > Any objections against raising this to 4.0? AFAIK all major
> > > > > application/servlet containers have versions with support for 4.0.
> > > > >
> > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > Emond
> > > > >
> > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 1:04 PM Martijn Dashorst
> > > > > <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Just the maven coordinates.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > As for expected problems: probably folks have to update their
> poms to
> > > > > > use the jakarta variants, but mostly they shouldn't bite if they
> use
> > > > > > the provided scope.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > For benefits:
> > > > > > - the Jakarta group-id is the future, all servers will move to
> that
> > > > > > maven coordinate
> > > > > > - the licensing is now uniform (Eclipse) instead of whatever the
> spec
> > > > > > lead thought was good
> > > > > > - marketing: "Wicket has moved to use the Jakarta EE Maven
> artifacts,
> > > > > > embracing the future of Java Enterprise software development"
> > > > > > - hopefully the naming of the GAV will remain sane, instead of
> each
> > > > > > spec lead using a different naming scheme (even across versions)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martijn
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:03 PM Martin Grigorov <
> > > mgrigo...@apache.org>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Hi Emond,
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > If it is just about different Maven coordinates then it is OK.
> > > > > > > For the change javax.servlet -> jakarta.servlet it is too soon.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 12:40 PM Emond Papegaaij <
> > > > > emond.papega...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Hi all,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > While building our application against Wicket 9, I noticed
> Wicket
> > > > > > > > still uses the Java EE 8 APIs. I would like to change these
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > > Jakarta versions. The APIs themselves are completely
> identical,
> > > it is
> > > > > > > > just the maven coordinate that changes. They do however come
> > > with a
> > > > > > > > better license (Eclipse). What do you think?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Best regards,
> > > > > > > > Emond
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best:
> > > http://wicketinaction.com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Jeroen Steenbeeke
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Jeroen Steenbeeke
>

Reply via email to