+1 :) (enclosures can easily workarounded, queue is something we are not
using :)))

On Fri, 23 Apr 2021 at 16:48, Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> wrote:

> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:58 AM Sven Meier <s...@meiers.net> wrote:
>
> > x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing.
> >
>
> Wow!
> I've suggested removing the enclosures some years ago but it was voted down
> with the explanation that it works 80-90% of the time and this is good
> enough. There are many open tickets in JIRA which are for the rest 10-20 %.
> I'd vote to remove <wicket:enclosure>!
>
> About the component queueing - I think at the moment only Andrea knows its
> internals. I am not sure how many users use it but removing it will
> simplify a lot!
>
>
> >
> > Have fun
> > Sven
> >
> >
> > On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working
> on
> > > Wicket 10 ?
> > >
> > > Here are few ideas what to break :-)
> > >
> > > 1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.**
> > > 2) Use @Inject + @Named instead of @SpringBean. If everything is
> covered
> > > by @Inject we may deprecate @SpringBean in 9.x
> > > 3) Depending on the release date we may even bump Java to 17 (it is
> going
> > > to be released this September and it is going to be LTS). I expect
> Wicket
> > > 10.0.0 to be released in 1-2 years from now, so by this time Java 17
> > should
> > > be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still
> use
> > > Java 8 for some reason.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Martin
> > >
> >
>


-- 
Best regards,
Maxim

Reply via email to