We do not use enclosures or component queueing either. -Matt Pavlovich
> On Apr 24, 2021, at 3:56 PM, Francois Meillet <francois.meil...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I don't use enclosures and component queueing > > Kind regards, > François > > > >> Le 24 avr. 2021 à 20:52, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <reier...@gmail.com> a >> écrit : >> >> Hi, >> >> On Sat, Apr 24, 2021 at 2:13 PM Tobias Soloschenko >> <tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com.invalid >> <mailto:tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com.invalid>> wrote: >> >>> Hi everyone, >>> >>> from my side I also would prefer removing component queuing (+1), >>> enclosures I would prefer a rework and not to remove it (+0). >>> >>> In addition to Martin’s list I would add some points >>> >>> — Martin's list — >>> 4) Move wicket-http2-servlet4 into core and remove wicket-http2-jetty / >>> wicket-http2-tomcat / wicket-http2-undertow / wicket-http2-core (I would >>> prefer doing it in 10 over 9) >>> 5) May remove wicket-metrics (I have the feeling that this is used rarely >>> over other reporting frameworks) >>> >> >> I have the impression the practice before "always" was to move things to >> wicket-stuff once they were no longer supported as core features. E.g. >> things like treetables and so on. Correct? >> >> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>>> Am 24.04.2021 um 11:07 schrieb Korbinian Bachl < >>> korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de>: >>>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> we dont use queueing but we use enclosures in quite a few places. >>> Getting rid of it would mean we have to switch to markup containers holding >>> the content and add additonal layer of complexity and boilerplatecode for >>> us. >>>> >>>> Beside that: can wicket 10 finally get rid of jQuery? Since IE is now >>> definitely dead I dont see any reason why this is still needed.... >>>> >>>> Best, >>>> KB >>>> >>>> >>>> ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- >>>>> Von: "Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro" >>>>> An: dev@wicket.apache.org >>>>> Gesendet: Freitag, 23. April 2021 12:04:34 >>>>> Betreff: Re: Wicket 10 ideas >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Apr 23, 2021 at 11:58 AM Sven Meier wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> x) remove/rework enclosures and component queueing. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> It would be interesting to know how many people really use queuing >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Have fun >>>>>> Sven >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On 02.04.21 13:58, Martin Grigorov wrote: >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Now since we have 9.3.0 released is it time to start thinking/working >>> on >>>>>>> Wicket 10 ? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here are few ideas what to break :-) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> 1) Move to Servlet 5.x, i.e. jakarta.servlet.** >>>>>>> 2) Use @Inject + @Named instead of @SpringBean. If everything is >>> covered >>>>>>> by @Inject we may deprecate @SpringBean in 9.x >>>>>>> 3) Depending on the release date we may even bump Java to 17 (it is >>> going >>>>>>> to be released this September and it is going to be LTS). I expect >>> Wicket >>>>>>> 10.0.0 to be released in 1-2 years from now, so by this time Java 17 >>>>>> should >>>>>>> be mainstream! :-) I know that this is too brave. Most projects still >>> use >>>>>>> Java 8 for some reason. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> Martin >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >>> >>> >> >> -- >> Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >
