Thanks to all who responded! https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6887
On Thu, Apr 22, 2021 at 11:03 PM Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> wrote: > +1 to make the module stable > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021 at 5:23 PM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > +1 > > > > from mobile (sorry for typos ;) > > > > > > On Wed, Apr 21, 2021, 16:52 Tobias Soloschenko > > <tobiassolosche...@googlemail.com.invalid> wrote: > > > > > Good idea. My suggestion would be to move it into core directly, > because > > > it is standard servlet API as of version 4. > > > > > > Any other opinions? > > > > > > kind regards > > > > > > Tobias > > > > > > > Am 21.04.2021 um 10:52 schrieb Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org > >: > > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > Shall we make wicket-http2 a stable module now in master branch > (Wicket > > > > 10.x) ? > > > > There we upgraded from Servlet 3 to Servlet 5 and this makes > > PushBuilder > > > > class available (it is introduced in Servlet 4). > > > > > > > > I suggest to drop the modules for Tomcat, Jetty and Undertow, and > merge > > > the > > > > classes from -servlet4 and -core modules into one (wicket-http2) or > to > > > move > > > > them to -core directly. > > > > > > > > WDYT ? > > > > > > > > Martin > > > > > > > > -- > Andrea Del Bene. > Apache Wicket committer. >