On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:58 AM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro <reier...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi, > > What I mean is to do a table of pros VS cons of dropping this feature. For > instance, I just remember someone did a profiling of his application and > reported that wicket (in his application) was slower after this feature was > introduced (a pro of removing it, maybe wicket will be faster). All > the work to get rid of it (a con). > Do you offer to do this comparison ? I do offer to remove it because of the following reasons: - in the earlier mails just one person said that he uses it. To make the poll more statistically accurate we could ask in users@ and at Twitter too - almost no one from the Wicket dev team knows how this works internally. Only Andrea tries to fix bugs in this functionality. I believe Igor lost interest in Wicket (and open source, in general) because of the Component Queueing - component queueing and auto-components don't work well. Much more people use auto-components (anything <wicket:***) than component.queue(...) > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:43 AM Martin Terra < > martin.te...@koodaripalvelut.com> wrote: > > > ke 2. kesäk. 2021 klo 9.36 Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro (reier...@gmail.com > ) > > kirjoitti: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > On Wed, Jun 2, 2021 at 9:14 AM Martin Grigorov <mgrigo...@apache.org> > > > wrote: > > > > > > > On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 10:51 PM Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro < > > > > reier...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > > > > > > How much work do you think this will imply? > > > > > > > > > > > > > Removing the component queueing ? > > > > I am not sure. Removing should be easier than implementing it. > > > > Why do you ask ? > > > > > > > > > > It is removing + fixing back all things that were changed because of > > this > > > feature.I have the impression this implied a lot of minor changes. Now > it > > > is reverting all that and making sure everything works again. Thus I > was > > > just wondering if it will be worth the effort to do that just to remove > > > something that is almost working in all cases. > > > > > > > +1 > > > > > > > > -- > > > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > > > > > > > > -- > Regards - Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro >
